Maharashtra’s decision to bar homeopaths from prescribing allopathic medicines has sparked a legal showdown in the Bombay High Court. The move, aimed at protecting patient safety, faces opposition from homeopaths seeking to practice modern medicine.
Pune | 23 July, 2025: In a pivotal moment for Maharashtra’s healthcare landscape, the state’s decision to prohibit homeopathic practitioners from prescribing allopathic medicines has landed in the Bombay High Court, igniting a fierce debate over patient safety and professional boundaries. This contentious ban, announced in July 2025, reverses earlier permissions that allowed homeopaths with a six-month Certificate Course in Modern Pharmacology (CCMP) to prescribe modern medicines. The policy shift, driven by concerns over inadequate training and potential risks to patients, has left families, doctors, and homeopaths grappling with its implications for accessible healthcare, particularly in rural areas.
The controversy traces back to a 2014 amendment to the Maharashtra Homoeopathic Practitioners Act, which permitted homeopaths to practice allopathy after completing the CCMP. However, the Indian Medical Association (IMA) and allopathic doctors fiercely opposed this, arguing that a short course cannot equip homeopaths with the rigorous training required for modern medicine, which demands years of study through an MBBS program. The Bombay High Court had previously stayed similar permissions in 2017, citing risks to patients. The recent ban, prompted by renewed protests from the IMA and a tragic misdiagnosis case in Pune, seeks to uphold medical standards but has sparked backlash from homeopaths who feel their contributions are being unfairly dismissed.
For rural Maharashtra, where an 80% shortage of specialist doctors persists, homeopaths have often filled critical healthcare gaps. The state’s 62,000 homeopathic practitioners argue that their pharmacology training enables them to serve underserved communities safely. The ban, however, prioritizes patient safety, with the IMA warning that inadequate training could lead to misdiagnoses and harmful treatments. Families in remote areas now fear reduced access to care, while urban patients worry about the clarity of medical qualifications in an already complex healthcare system.
The Bombay High Court’s involvement signals hope for a balanced resolution. The court is reviewing the ban’s legality, with the IMA pushing for strict enforcement and homeopaths advocating for their right to practice under regulated conditions. A seven-member expert committee, formed by the state to reassess the policy, has failed to satisfy either side, with homeopaths questioning its impartiality and allopathic doctors insisting on judicial oversight. The court’s ruling, expected in the coming months, will shape Maharashtra’s healthcare framework.
This legal battle touches the heart of Pune’s communities, where trust in healthcare providers is paramount. As the court deliberates, Punekars and rural residents alike await a decision that balances safety with access, ensuring no family is left vulnerable. The outcome could redefine how Maharashtra bridges its doctor shortage while safeguarding lives.
Follow us On Our Social media Handles :
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/newsdotz/
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/@NewsDotz
Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61573903448264
Twitter – https://x.com/NewsDotz
Also Read- Pune
