Controversy over lavish engagement of Indurikar Maharaj’s daughter draws public criticism, actor Nilesh Sable weighs in
Indurikar Maharaj
The grand engagement of Indurikar Maharaj’s daughter has sparked backlash amid his advocacy of simplicity. Actor Nilesh Sable commented that the matter is personal and opinions vary.
Maharashtra | Nov 21, 2025 – :
The engagement ceremony of Indurikar Maharaj’s daughter has sparked heated discussion on social media and among critics, following allegations that the event was extravagantly organised — in contrast to the preacher’s repeated messages on simplicity and eschewing ostentatious celebrations. While Maharaj often speaks of minimalism in religious life and urges followers to avoid debt and lavish spending at weddings, the engagement reportedly featured luxury décor, a large procession, premium vehicles and designer outfits for the bride-to-be, prompting critics to call the two-tier standard “hypocritical.”
The pushback escalated quickly online, with users highlighting the disparity between his public sermons and personal actions. Some of his detractors asked why someone who preaches austerity would authorise such an opulent function. Reports in the Marathi media say this was not a small gathering — the event included professional decorators, multiple cars and a procession that lasted several hours. Maharaj responded by saying he and his family had worked hard and that the occasion was for his daughter, and questioned why others felt entitled to pass judgment.
Amid the growing outrage, actor Nilesh Sable weighed in. Known for his role in the popular show “Chala Hawa Yeu Dya,” he said the event was a private family matter and expressed a more measured view: “In my opinion, this is a personal decision for the family. Everyone has the right to express themselves in their own way.” He avoided taking sides but underscored the idea that public figures are still human and can choose different paths from their public messaging. His comments offered a rare voice of moderation in a polarised conversation.
Supporters of Maharaj argued that critics were misreading the event by focusing solely on visuals, and reminded that celebratory functions have cultural significance in Maharashtrian families. They said the preacher’s message on simplicity remains valid—what matters is intention and not public optics. Meanwhile, some reform advocates responded that leaders should align their public teachings and personal practices to maintain credibility.
The controversy has also sharpened the angle of social media’s role in public religious life. Numerous memes appeared reflecting the paradox of the preacher’s statements versus the event, and news outlets noted how quickly small local functions can become regional moral debates. Community watchers say the incident may prompt more scrutiny of religious and social leaders’ personal lives and how they reflect their messages.
For now, the engagement stands completed and the unhappy chatter persists. Maharaj’s supporters say the family is moving on, while critics say the event should trigger introspection on institutional contradictions. Nilesh Sable’s commentary has provided a pause in the beating rhythm of condemnation, pointing to the need for nuance and personal autonomy.
