Ajit Pawar Avoids Comment on Ashish Shelar’s Veer Savarkar Remark, Says He Will Not Respond

NCP leader Ajit Pawar refuses to comment on BJP leader Ashish Shelar’s statement related to Veer Savarkar, saying he does not wish to respond to the issue.

January 6, 2026 | Mumbai – Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister and senior NCP leader Ajit Pawar has chosen to stay away from controversy after being asked about BJP leader Ashish Shelar’s recent remarks concerning Veer Savarkar. Pawar’s response, reported on January 6, 2026, has drawn political attention as debates around historical figures and ideological positions continue to surface in the state’s political discourse.

When questioned by the media about Ashish Shelar’s statement on Veer Savarkar, Ajit Pawar made it clear that he would not offer any reaction. He stated that he does not wish to comment on the matter, effectively refusing to be drawn into the controversy. His brief but firm response immediately became a talking point, especially given the sensitivity surrounding Savarkar-related debates in Maharashtra.

Veer Savarkar remains a deeply polarising figure in Indian politics, particularly in Maharashtra, where discussions about his legacy often trigger sharp reactions across party lines. Statements or criticisms involving Savarkar frequently escalate into political confrontations, with leaders either strongly defending or opposing narratives associated with him. In this context, Ajit Pawar’s decision to remain silent is being seen as a calculated political stance.

Political observers believe Pawar’s refusal to comment reflects a strategic attempt to avoid unnecessary controversy at a time when Maharashtra is witnessing intense political activity due to upcoming civic and local body elections. Analysts note that engaging in ideological debates could distract from governance issues and electoral strategy, particularly for leaders holding key administrative positions.

Ajit Pawar, known for his pragmatic political approach, has often focused on development, administration, and coalition management rather than ideological confrontations. By declining to respond to Shelar’s remark, Pawar appears to be reinforcing his preference to stay focused on governance-related matters rather than symbolic or historical debates.

Leaders from the BJP, meanwhile, have continued to defend Ashish Shelar’s statement, asserting that Savarkar’s contribution to India’s freedom struggle should be recognised and respected. Opposition leaders, however, have expressed differing views, with some criticising attempts to politicise historical figures for electoral gain. Against this backdrop, Pawar’s silence stands out as a deliberate departure from the ongoing verbal exchanges.

Reactions from political circles have been mixed. Some leaders praised Ajit Pawar for avoiding polarising debates and maintaining political restraint. Others interpreted his response as an attempt to sidestep a sensitive issue that could complicate alliance dynamics within Maharashtra’s complex political landscape.

Public reactions have also varied, with sections of society appreciating a focus on current issues such as development, economy, and civic governance, while others believe political leaders should openly express their views on historical and ideological matters. Social media discussions reflected both support and criticism of Pawar’s stance.

The episode highlights how statements related to historical figures like Veer Savarkar continue to influence contemporary politics, often overshadowing policy-driven discussions. For leaders in coalition governments, navigating such issues requires careful balancing to avoid internal friction and public backlash.

As of January 6, 2026, Ajit Pawar has made it clear that he does not intend to comment further on Ashish Shelar’s Savarkar-related remark. His decision underscores a political strategy focused on restraint and prioritising governance over controversy.

Whether this silence will have any long-term political implications remains to be seen. For now, Ajit Pawar’s refusal to respond has added another layer to Maharashtra’s evolving political narrative, where silence itself can sometimes speak louder than words.

Follow us On Our Social media Handles :
Instagram
Youtube
Facebook
Twitter

Also Read- Pune