Ajit Pawar Intervenes to Resolve Political Tussle Between Sunil Tatkare and Bharat Gogawale in Raigad
Ajit Pawar
Ajit Pawar has stepped in to mediate a growing political dispute in Raigad district involving Sunil Tatkare, Bharat Gogawale and other key leaders.
Raigad, December 13, 2025 – Senior Maharashtra leader Ajit Pawar has intervened to address an escalating political dispute in Raigad district, where differences between rival camps led by Sunil Tatkare and Bharat Gogawale have intensified in recent weeks. The move is seen as an effort to prevent internal divisions from weakening organisational strength and to restore coordination among district leaders.
The political tension in Raigad has involved several influential figures, including Mahendra Dalvi and Mahendra Throve, whose involvement has added layers to the dispute. Differences over leadership influence, decision-making authority and organisational roles are believed to be at the core of the conflict. Party workers have expressed concern that prolonged infighting could disrupt grassroots activity and affect public perception.
Ajit Pawar’s mediation is aimed at bringing all sides to the table and encouraging dialogue rather than confrontation. According to political insiders, he has held discussions with senior leaders from both camps, stressing the importance of unity and discipline. Pawar reportedly warned that public disagreements damage credibility and create opportunities for political opponents to capitalise on internal weaknesses.
Raigad district holds strategic political importance in Maharashtra due to its electoral influence and demographic diversity. Any instability among senior leaders can have a direct impact on local organisation and voter confidence. Observers say Pawar’s decision to personally intervene reflects the seriousness with which the leadership views the situation.
Local sources indicate that the dispute grew as supporters of different leaders began asserting dominance in organisational matters, leading to confusion among party workers. Parallel meetings and mixed signals reportedly made coordination difficult at the grassroots level. Pawar’s role is expected to help streamline communication and clarify leadership responsibilities.
During the mediation process, Pawar is believed to have urged leaders to resolve their differences internally and avoid airing disputes in public. He emphasised that collective goals should take priority over personal ambitions, especially at a time when political focus is expected to remain on governance and upcoming electoral challenges.
Political analysts note that Ajit Pawar has often acted as a troubleshooter in similar situations, relying on negotiation and consensus-building rather than open confrontation. His involvement in Raigad is seen as part of a broader strategy to maintain cohesion across districts where local power dynamics can quickly escalate into factionalism.
Reactions among party workers have been cautiously hopeful. Many believe that Pawar’s mediation could lead to a compromise that allows all factions to work together within a unified framework. Local leaders have said that clear direction from senior leadership is essential to prevent confusion and restore confidence among workers.
As discussions continue, attention remains on whether the rival camps will reach an understanding that ensures stability in the district. A successful resolution could involve adjustments in responsibilities and clearer coordination mechanisms. For now, Ajit Pawar’s intervention has shifted the dispute into structured dialogue, with expectations that unity will prevail over division.
