Jaykumar Gore counters Praniti Shinde’s “commission” charge over Solapur DPDC funds
Solapur
Praniti Shinde accused Solapur guardian minister Jaykumar Gore of blocking DPDC funds; Gore hit back saying funds are released only through formal approvals, not letters or political pressure.
Solapur, Maharashtra | Nov 22, 2025 – 500 to 600 words, no subheadings):
A public confrontation has erupted in Solapur after Congress MP Praniti Shinde alleged that District Planning and Development Council funds were being withheld because she refused to pay a commission. She claimed development works across her constituency had stalled and warned that she would take legal action if the delays continued. According to her, several projects proposed by Mahavikas Aghadi representatives, including MPs Omraje Nimbalkar and Dhairyasheel Mohite Patil, were being deliberately blocked.
Jaykumar Gore, Solapur’s guardian minister, rejected the accusation outright. Speaking in Pandharpur, he said the system does not work on letterheads or informal requests and insisted that projects are approved only after committee meetings, discussions and documented resolutions. He questioned why anyone would expect funds to be released simply because a request was written on a letter pad. Gore added that those who had built their careers around demanding cuts were now resorting to public accusations to stay politically relevant.
Gore also argued that the DPDC cannot release money for proposals that have not gone through proper procedures. He cited past instances in which reminders were sent to various offices asking them to complete paperwork before expecting sanction. His remarks were aimed not only at Shinde but also at broader claims that the BJP-led administration was prioritising its own allies. He maintained that funds are allocated strictly on the basis of approvals, not political alignment.
The controversy deepened when BJP MLA Devendra Kothe entered the discussion, asking Shinde to disclose how much central funding she had brought to her constituency and how it was spent. He accused her of knowing only “percentage politics” and said the public deserved transparency. This exchange has intensified the friction between the two parties, especially ahead of local elections.
DPDC funds are crucial for essential works in Solapur, including roads, schools, water facilities and small-scale rural infrastructure. When funds are delayed, contractors cannot begin or complete work, and local development suffers. Contractors in the district confirmed that several projects had been stuck for months but said they did not know whether political disputes or administrative delays were to blame.
For citizens, the back-and-forth between leaders is less important than the impact on ongoing works. Rural areas in particular rely on timely DPDC releases to maintain basic services. Analysts say the dispute may influence voter sentiment, especially if the perception grows that political infighting is slowing development.
The timing of the clash is significant. With civic polls approaching, both parties are positioning themselves as champions of development. The Congress is trying to highlight alleged administrative biases, while the BJP is framing the issue as one of procedural discipline. Gore’s assertion that funds will not be released without proper documentation indicates that the administration wants to project an image of rule-based governance.
In the coming weeks, attention will be on whether any pending projects receive approval and if the dispute triggers a review of DPDC processes. The political tone in Solapur has clearly sharpened, and both parties will attempt to turn this episode into electoral advantage. For now, the residents and contractors affected by stalled works are hoping the tension translates into quicker decisions rather than continued delays.
